Friday, 30 September 2022

consider the kingfisher

https://aims.vmis.in/caa-exhibitions/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/White-breasted-kingfisher-ca-1625-Sir-Cowasji-Jehangir-Collection-copy.jpghttps://streetartutopia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Kingfisher-street-art-by-A-MO-in-Bordeaux-France-1068x1335.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1c/f9/4b/1cf94b076bfd60a71deab6dfc87ea59f.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/cf/2a/d4/cf2ad48c0c6046411ebe579f8faf1a5f.jpg



https://i.pinimg.com/originals/83/62/51/836251c610b32a06e29409d35dcfb8fa.jpghttps://i1.wp.com/thenatureofgraffiti.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Bogota-UnivNational-Kingfisher.jpg?fit=1200%2C900https://bashooka.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/street-art-2.jpghttps://i.pinimg.com/736x/59/f6/a1/59f6a1603bdfeb21d9e7090a6e1da057.jpg



Kingfishers are generally shy birds, but in spite of this, they feature heavily in human culture, generally due to the large head supporting its powerful mouth, their bright plumage, or some species' interesting behavior.[19]

1665007519066.png


For the Dusun people of Borneo, the Oriental dwarf kingfisher is considered a bad omen, and warriors who see one on the way to battle should return home. Another Bornean tribe considers the banded kingfisher an omen bird, albeit generally a good omen.[10]

The sacred kingfisher, along with other Pacific kingfishers, was venerated by the Polynesians, who believed it had control over the seas and waves.


1665007363806.png


The common kingfisher was first described by Carl Linnaeus in the 10th edition of his Systema Naturae in 1758 as Gracula atthis.[2][3][4] The modern binomial name derives from the Latin alcedo, 'kingfisher' (from Greek ἀλκυών, halcyon), and Atthis, a beautiful young woman of Lesbos, and favourite of Sappho.[5]

1665007401715.png



Greek mythology is rich in wonderful stories that are often woven into everyday life. One such story is that of Halcyone, the daughter of Aeolus, the god of the wind.


Halcyone and her husband Ceyx were so happy in their marriage that they imagined themselves to be gods. They therefore did not call each other by their own names, but let themselves be called Zeus and Hera, equal to the supreme god and his wife. This incurred the wrath of Zeus, who caused Ceyx to perish at sea during a storm. In sorrow, Halcyone also threw herself into the sea, after which Zeus changed her into a kingfisher. From then on Halcyone flies along the Greek coasts, always looking for her lost lover, and is doomed to make her nest on the beach in the midst of winter, where her eggs are swept away by the winter storms.


In time, so the story goes, Zeus took pity on Halcyone. He ensured that there would be no winter storms for seven days every winter. While her father Aeolus keeps the winds and waves in check, the kingfisher can hatch her eggs during these ‘Halcyone days’.

1665009390334.png


The common kingfisher has no song.



Modern taxonomy also refers to the winds and sea in naming kingfishers after a classical Greek myth. The first pair of the mythical-bird Halcyon (kingfishers) were created from a marriage of Alcyone and Ceyx. As gods, they lived the sacrilege of referring to themselves as Zeus and Hera. They died for this, but the other gods, in an act of compassion, made them into birds, thus restoring them to their original seaside habitat. In addition, special "halcyon days" were granted. These are the seven days on either side of the winter solstice when storms shall never again occur for them. The Halcyon birds' "days" were for caring for the winter-hatched clutch (or brood), but the phrase "Halcyon days" also refers specifically to an idyllic time in the past, or in general to a peaceful time.

Various kinds of kingfishers and human cultural artifacts are named after the couple, in reference to this metamorphosis myth:

Not all the kingfishers are named in this way. The etymology of kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) is obscure; the term comes from "king's fisher", but why that name was applied is not known.[20]

1665007464758.png


18 BIRD STUDY
Nesting success
Nesting success was calculated using the method described by Mayfield (1961),
which makes the best use of the fragmentary information found on many nest
record cards. Mayfield uses the term 'exposure', the number of nests lost varying
with the number of nests in the sample, and with the number of days that each
is under observation. The unit of exposure used in this analysis is the 'nest-day'
(one nest under observation for one day). During the incubation period 13 nests
were lost in 820 nest-days' exposure. The failure rate is therefore 13/820 = 0.016
nests lost per nest-day. During the fledging period seven nests were lost in 1,237
nest-days' exposure, giving a failure rate of 0.006 nests lost per nest-day.
The probability of survival of nests with a failure rate r for a period of days d
is (1— r)g. During incubation (20 days) the probability of survival is therefore
(1 —0.016) 20 0.724, and during the fledging period (25 days) it is (1-0.006) 2 ° =
0.0860. The probability that Kingfisher nests will survive both the incubation and
the fledging periods is 0.724 x 0.860 = 0.623 or 62.3%.
Failures recorded during the incubation period were mainly due to human dis-
turbance, people either taking the eggs or enlarging the tunnel (eight records). One
interesting record was of a Mole Talpa europaea having passed through the nest-
ing chamber. A further six cards recorded destruction of the tunnel. The King-
fisher is probably more susceptible than any other species to the improvement of
land drainage on lowland rivers. The extended breeding season means that nests
are at risk in all but five months of the year. The hazards to a nesting Kingfisher
include damage to banks by heavy machinery carrying out drainage work, and the
grading of banks which removes suitable nest sites altogether. Apart from affect-
ing breeding in this way, the elimination of trees and bushes from the river-side
may remove necessary fishing perches from long stretches of the stream.
During the fledging period three instances of nests being dug out by boys or
animals were recorded. Two records are of interest: one refers to dead young
below a nest entrance, and the other to a territorial fight between rival males.
Clancey (1935) noted that when Kingfishers are reasonably spaced during the
breeding season little attention is paid to territorial rights, but when they are in
close proximity to one another fighting is frequent. He recorded three occurrences
of eggs being destroyed by rival pairs, and one instance of young being left to die,
most probably after the parents had been chased away in a territorial dispute.
Kingfishers can be very aggressive towards each other, and the young are not
tolerated in the territory for long after leaving the nest.
MORTALITY
Kingfisher annual mortality was estimated from recoveries of birds ringed up to
1970, using the method described by Lack (1943). The longest-lived individual was
ringed in July 1964 and was found dead four and a half years later in January
1969.
Table IV shows that mortality is high with three-quarters of the population
dying each year (note that standard errors are large). Assuming the sex ratio to
be equal, this means that 76 young must survive to breed for every 100 King-
fishers at the start of the year, in order to maintain population stability. The
trapping of breeding adults originally ringed as nestlings shows that Kingfishers
are able to breed when one year old (Brown 1934). Kingfishers lay fairly large clutches

1665009684826.png



British population is not isolated and there are two
recoveries of birds ringed in Britain being recovered in France: one representing
a movement of 430 km (267 miles), and the other 505 km (314 miles). There is
also one in Belgium (Figure 4) involving a movement of 555 km (345 miles), the
longest distance known to have been travelled by a British Kingfisher. There is
one recovery indicating movement in an opposite direction, from Brittany to
North Wales


A challenge for any diving bird is the change in refraction between air and water. The eyes of many birds have two foveae (the fovea is the area of the retina with the greatest density of light receptors),[21] and a kingfisher can switch from the main central fovea to the auxiliary fovea when it enters water; a retinal streak of high receptor density which connects the two foveae allows the image to swing temporally as the bird drops onto the prey.[22] The egg-shaped lens of the eye points towards the auxiliary fovea, enabling the bird to maintain visual acuity underwater.[21] Because of the positions of the foveae, the kingfisher has monocular vision in air, and binocular vision in water. The underwater vision is not as a sharp as in air, but the ability to judge the distance of moving prey is more important than the sharpness of the image.[22]

Each cone cell of a bird's retina contains an oil droplet that may contain carotenoid pigments. These droplets enhance color vision and reduce glare. Aquatic kingfishers have high numbers of red pigments in their oil droplets; the reason red droplets predominate is not understood, but the droplets may help with the glare or the dispersion of light from particulate matter in the water.[22]

 

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5f/4c/7b/5f4c7b4064869e0f524b064a4eb1e432.jpg 

Kingfisher

Kingfisher Lyrics
Whose is the hand that I will hold?
Whose is the face I will see?
Whose is the name that I will call
When I am called to meet thee?

In this life who did you love
Beneath the drifting ashes?
Beneath the sheeting banks of air
That barrenly bore our rations?

When I could speak it was too late
Didn't you hear me calling?
Didn't you see my heart leap like
A pup in the constant barley?

In this new life where did you crouch
When the sky had set to boiling?
Burnin' within; seen from without
And your gut was a serpent coiling

And for the sake of that pit o' snakes
For whom did you allay your shyness?
And spend all your mercy and madness and grace
In a day beneath the bending cypress?

It was not on principle
Show, pro-heart, that you have got gall
A miracle!
I can bear a lot but not that pall
I can bear a lot but not that pall
Kingfisher, sound the alarm
Say, "sweet little darlin', now, come to my arms
Tell me all about the love you left on the farm"

He was a kind, unhurried man
With a heavy lip and a steady hand
But he loved me just like a little child,
A little child loves a little lamb

Thrown to the ground by something down there
Bitten by the bad air while the clouds tick
Trying to read all the signs
Preparing for when the bombs hit

Hung from the underbelly of the earth
While the stars skid away below
Gormless and brakeless, gravel-loose
Falling silent as gavels in the snow

I lay back and spit in my chaw
Wrapped in the long arm of the law
Who has seen it all
I can bear a lot but not that pall
I can bear a lot but not that pall
Kingfisher, cast your fly
O lord, it happens without even tryin'
When I sling a low look from my shuttering eye

Blows rain upon the one you loved
And though you were only sparring
There's blood on the eye, unlace the glove
Say, honey, I am not sorry

Stand here and name the one you loved
Beneath the drifting ashes
And in naming, rise above time
As it, flashing, passes

We came by the boatload
And were immobilised
Worshiping volcanoes
Charting the loping skies

The tides of the earth left
Us bound and calcified and made as
Obstinate as obsidian
Unmoving, save our eyes

Just mooning and blinking
From faces marked with coal
Ash cooling and shrinking
Cracks loud as thunder rollin', I swear

I know you; you know me
Where have we met before, tell me true?
To whose authority
Do you consign your soul?

I had a dream you came to me
Sayin', you shall not do me harm anymore
And with your knife you evicted my life
From its little lighthouse on the seashore

And I saw that my blood had no bounds
Spreading in a circle like an atom bomb
Soaking and felling everything in it's path
And welling in my heart like a birdbath

It is too short, the day we are born
We commence with our dying
Trying to serve with the heart of a child
Kingfisher lie with the lion

Lyrics submitted by mutinyinheaven_x, edited by

Default user

Share your thoughts...

23 Comments

Default avatar
xypotion

My Interpretation

22/05/2010

My theory is that it's a tragic love story that took place during World War II. The religious references are not the focus of the song, I think. It took me a long time to see it, but the context speaks of the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

First, Kingfisher was a bomber in the air force, or perhaps a fighter pilot. The stanza that illustrates that best is:
"I can bear a lot but not that pall
Kingfisher, cast your fly
O lord, it happens without even tryin'
When I sling a low look from my shuttering eye"

Other things like rations, "sounding the alarm" and "preparing for when the bombs hit" keyed me in to war at first, and there's more evidence later in the song that she's talking specifically about Pearl Harbor.

I think Joanna does switch narrators several times during the song. She sometimes sings as Kingfisher him/herself, but other parts are his/her lover addressing or observing Kingfisher. The "quiet" part at the end is more historic, and definitely speaks to me of the persecution of the Japanese after Pearl Harbor:

"We came by the boatload
And were immobilised
Worshiping volcanoes
Charting the loping skies

The tides of the earth left
Us bound and calcified and made as
Obstinate as obsidian
Unmoving, save our eyes"

The stanza:
"I know you; you know me
Where have we met before, tell me true?
To whose authority
Do you consign your soul?"
Clinches the relationship between Kingfisher and the other character; S/he was a Japanese immigrant, and they were lovers before the war. S/he might have even been an actual Japanese spy, but that's not stated very clearly in the song. Now s/he is imprisoned on a military base (in Hawaii?), where Kingfisher sees him/her again.

"To whose authority / Do you consign your soul?" is a reference (almost a joke) about the Japanese' devotion to their emperor versus Americans' to the flag. What they did to the Japanese after Pearl Harbor was pretty atrocious.... The "dream" where Kingfisher kills the lover as if by an atom bomb (a basically undeniable Japan reference) is the final stroke. All hope is lost for the him/her, and s/he expresses his/her regret in the final stanza for the choices they each made.

They rest of the song, while beautiful and fully up to Newsom's poetic standards, says more about their love and less about what actually happened. It's still a love song, but with a historical context and a tragic outcome!

2 Likes

4 Replies

Default avatar
sanfordc

General Comment

04/04/2010

Anyone have any ideas on what it means? All I can come up with:

"Kingfisher" might allude to the myth of Alcyone, whose husband Ceyx was killed at sea, came to her in a dream to tell her he had died, whereupon she went to the seashore and threw herself in. They were both turned to kingfishers.

Also, I guess the whole thing is sort of like an investigation/questioning. Obviously several lines end in question marks, but the part about "The long arm of the law" and "Who has seen it all?" make it sound like they are looking for someone. A murderer, perhaps, considering later there are images of murder (not least in the dream at the end).

The lines "Blows rain upon the one you loved, and though you were only sparring there's blood on the eye, unlace the glove, say honey I am not sorry" are pretty unsettling for me, and show this overarching violence.

Of course, also the pall, which is a sheet that you cover a coffin with, is an image of death.

Unfortunately, I don't know how to put all of these things together. It's hard to tell if Joanna is switching narrators throughout the song, who the kingfisher is, how many people are asking questions and being asked questions, how many people are loving other people or killing other people, etc. The whole middle section, "We came by the boatload" to "Do you consign your soul?" really baffles me. What might the recurring images of bombs/ashes/volcanoes mean?

Also, the stanza, "Hung from the underbelly of the Earth" is one of my favorite Joanna stanzas. But I don't understand it at all.

Any feedback/thoughts/ideas?

1 Likes

2 Replies

Default avatar
ao7hin

General Comment

02/05/2010

I'm not entirely sure, but in my interpretation it seems to touch on the ideas of eternity and reincarnation. Saying that, I think sanfordc's take on it is very interesting indeed.

1 Likes

0 Replies

Default avatar
INTP233

General Comment

27/03/2014

Here is a Gerrard Manley Hopkins poem:

As Kingfisher's Catch Fire

AS kingfishers catch fire, dragonflies dráw fláme;
As tumbled over rim in roundy wells
Stones ring; like each tucked string tells, each hung bell’s
Bow swung finds tongue to fling out broad its name;
Each mortal thing does one thing and the same: 5
Deals out that being indoors each one dwells;
Selves—goes itself; myself it speaks and spells,
Crying Whát I do is me: for that I came.

Í say móre: the just man justices;
Kéeps gráce: thát keeps all his goings graces; 10
Acts in God’s eye what in God’s eye he is—
Chríst—for Christ plays in ten thousand places,
Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his
To the Father through the features of men’s faces.



I think this poem works well with the song's religious/sacramental/nature imagery, but in a narrative sort of way. Thoughts?

1 Likes

1 Replies

Default avatar
sprout13

General Comment

15/02/2010

Such a beautiful song!
It is too short, the day we are born
We commence without dinning

Should be:
It is too short, the day we are born
We commence with our dying

0 Likes

0 Replies

Default avatar
predicate

General Comment

18/02/2010

this is certifiably epic

0 Likes

0 Replies

Default avatar
tinylittlewords

General Comment

03/03/2010

it's obstinate, not ostinate. haha

it sounds like it could be metaphorical for the end of a relationship. it would thematically match the progress of the album, at least. so wonderful.

0 Likes

2 Replies

Default avatar
mollyphillips69

General Comment

08/03/2010

This is the best song on Disc 3

0 Likes

0 Replies

Default avatar
mollyphillips69

General Comment

08/03/2010

This is the best song on Disc 3

0 Likes

0 Replies

Default avatar
speakforthwords

General Comment

13/04/2010

I think that this song is about Joanna contending with the idea of God. I think that most of the song is adressed to him. She drifts back and forth between doubt and moments of what seems to be faith. The first couple lines and the last couple lines are most explicit, but the relationship mentioned in some previous posts of we assume it to be one with God.

The ashes, volcanos, and other images of destruction call to mind a struggle with the idea of a good God in a painful world. She speaks of her youth when, for her, faith was still possible, saying in the third verse, saying,

When I could speak it was too late
Didn't you hear me calling?
Didn't you see my heart leap like
A pup in the constant barley?

Some really harsh and beautiful imagery that alludes to Christ is

Blows rain upon the one you loved
And though you were only sparring
There's blood on the eye, unlace the glove
Say, honey, I am not sorry

This language seems a bit sarcastic, but it is hard to say. The whole song is a bit pessimistic in its frustrations, but they are really well played out.

Like all good poetry this song shouldn't be pidgeon-holed as being excllusively about God, but largely the themes she discusses stem from her questions concerning Him. 




The Kingfisher by William Henry Davies

In ‘The Kingfisher’ Davies explores themes of solitude, nature, and beauty. The poem depicts the colors of the kingfisher, a small to medium-mixed brightly colored bird. They are often deep blue, orange, and yellow. It is likely that Davies was speaking about the common kingfisher, the most populous species in the United Kingdom.  

The Kingfisher
William Henry Davies

It was the Rainbow gave thee birth, And left thee all her lovely hues; And, as her mother’s name was Tears, So runs it in my blood to choose For haunts the lonely pools, and keep In company with trees that weep. Go you and, with such glorious hues, Live with proud peacocks in green parks; On lawns as smooth as shining glass, Let every feather show its marks; Get thee on boughs and clap thy wings Before the windows of proud kings. Nay, lovely Bird, thou art not vain; Thou hast no proud, ambitious mind; I also love a quiet place That’s green, away from all mankind; A lonely pool, and let a tree Sigh with her bosom over me.


Summary of The Kingfisher

The Kingfisher’ by William Henry Davies addresses a kingfisher and how it was given “birth” by a rainbow. The rainbow left it all its hues.

The creature goes through the world with its “glorious hues”. These allow it to stand proud alongside the colorful peacocks in the “green parks”. It is just as vibrant. The bird could also hold its own against the windows of kings, but it chooses not to. It is not “vain” as a human would be. Instead, it prefers the quiet, just like the speaker does.

Structure of The Kingfisher

The Kingfisher’ by William Henry Davies is a single stanza poem that contains eighteen lines. These lines follow a rhyming pattern of ABCBDDBEFEGGHIJIKK. This is less a pattern than it is an arrangement of lines that at times breaks into rhyming couplets and half-rhymes. The latter, half-rhyme,  also known as slant or partial rhyme, is seen through the repetition of assonance or consonance. This means that either a vowel or consonant sound is reused within one line, or multiple lines of verse. For instance, “you” and “hues” in line seven and “I” and “quiet” in line seventeen.

In regards to the meter, the lines are all divided into four sets of two beats, for a total of eight syllables per line.

 


Sunday, 24 April 2022

dead man's bridge 1891


https://www.londonslostrivers.com/uploads/5/6/0/3/5603187/background-images/784346920.jpeg

Pymmes Brook from Bowes Park to Edmonton

No current or recent warnings.

Flood Warning Area Details

The Pymmes Brook from Bowes Park to Edmonton

Region: London

Counties covered: Enfield, Greater London

Watercourses covered: Pymmes Brook

Area covered by this alert location

The area bounded in blue on the map shows the area covered by flood alerts and warnings for Pymmes Brook from Bowes Park to Edmonton.

Icons on the map show nearby level monitoring stations. They are not necessarily related to this particular flood warning area. 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

Leaflet | © OpenStreetMap contributors

Note: the area shown on the map is the area covered by flood alerts and warnings. It is not a live map of current flooding. The area covered broadly equates to the area where the risk of flooding in any year is greater than 1% (the "hundred year" flood risk).

Other Nearby Flood Warning Locations

Lower Lee tributaries
The Lower Lee tributaries, including the Nazeing Brook, Ching Brook, Cobbins Brook, Pymmes Brook, Rags Brook, Salmons Brook, Turkey Brook, Trinity Marsh Ditch and the Small River Lee

No current or recent warnings.

Salmons Brook at Grange Park and Lower Edmonton
The Salmons Brook at Grange Park and Lower Edmonton including World's End

No current or recent warnings.

Pymmes Brook at Upper Edmonton and Tottenham
The Pymmes Brook at Upper Edmonton and Tottenham

No current or recent warnings.

Pymmes Brook at East Barnet
The Pymmes Brook at East Barnet including Cockfosters and New Southgate

No current or recent warnings.

Lower River Lee at Enfield
The Lower River Lee at Enfield including Edmonton and Tottenham

No current or recent warnings.

Ching Brook in the London Borough of Waltham Forest
The Ching Brook in the London Borough of Waltham Forest, including Highams Park

No current or recent warnings.


Muswell Stream

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Muswell Stream is a watercourse in the London Borough of Haringey.[1] It originates in Muswell Hill from three source rivers. The largest of the springs is now under a private home on Muswell Road. In the 12th century, the spring was on land that belonged to the Bishop of London and was used as farmland. Healing powers were attributed to this source and it was therefore consecrated to the Virgin Maria and a chapel built in its place for the pilgrimage to take place. According to tradition, Scottish king Malcolm IV is said to have been healed by the water of the spring.

In 1875 one of the issues was diverted to a lake in Alexandra Park. The part of the park in question was sold in 1899, the lake drained and the watercourse moved underground to build Grove Avenue and Rosebery Road.

The Wood Green and Hornsey laundry used water from the Muswell Stream in the 1890s.

The watercourse was completely submerged in the 1920s and 1930s. Underground water reservoirs should not always successfully ensure that the watercourse absorbs large amounts of precipitation from its catchment area. The mouth of the Muswell Stream in the Pymmes Brook is the last visible part of the watercourse.

References


London's Lost Rivers (2011) Paul Talling, Random House, pp148-150 ISBN 9781847945976

Just south of central Palmers Green, as Green Lanes approaches the North Circular, are two bridges, the first crossing the New River (Kings Arms Bridge), and the second crossing Pymmes Brook, and going by the name Deadman’s Bridge.

Why it is called that we do not seem to know, but the name appears to be ancient. A History of the County of Middlesex vol 5 (www/british-history.ac.uk) states that in the sixteenth century Green Lanes was a collection of linked roads, one of them being Deadman’s Hill in Palmers Green. In 1789 they find a reference to “Bowes Farm Bridge, presumably Deadman’s bridge in Green Lanes” where “a single arch, was built…by the road trustees and repaired in 1822 by the county”. Presumably the 1789 bridge replaced an earlier structure, (given that Pymmes Brook always needed to be traversed by those heading north). Presumably too the present bridge is in part or wholly another post 1822 incarnation.  Does anyone know?

Another mystery is what occasioned the warning to traction engines and carriages which is posted on the bridge on a metal plaque (the wording is slightly unclear – the decifering below is by photographer Fin Fahey)

‘COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX / TAKE NOTICE that this Bridge / which is a County Bridge is insufficient to carry / weights beyond the [ordinary?] traffic of the / District and that the owners and persons in / charge of LOCOMOTIVE TRACTION ENGINES / and heavily laden CARRIAGES are warned / against using the Bridge for the passage of / any such Engines or Carriages / Richd. Nicholson / Clerk of the Peace.’

One reply on “The mystery of Deadman’s Bridge”Suzanne Beardsays:

https://ukcoinco.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/1942.jpg 

 


But the story of the southernmost bridge is harder to understand; the origin of the name seems lost in unrecorded history. It has been called Deadman’s Bridge for a long time. In one source the History of the County of Middlesex vol 5 “The Green Lanes” are recorded as a sequence of separate but linked road ways, although they took a more meandering route than the current north to south thoroughfare. From the sixteenth century the name Deadman’s Hill is associated with the stretch of road leading from the current North Circular up to Palmers Green triangle.

The National Archives list two contracts for repair of a “Bowes Farm Bridge, in Green Lanes” one in 1834 with the work carried out by Tottenham builder Michael Catling for £198 the second, in March 1884, looks promising as the contract was drawn up by Richard Nicholson - the man named on the metal Middlesex County Council sign in the photograph suggests that this is the same structure. Middlesex County Council, the local authority of its time, took on responsibility for maintaining transport infrastructure from the local parishes at a time of growing urbanisation – increasingly as local manor house and farm estates were broken up to provide housing.

So this may have been our bridge, however I wonder if there may have been confusion with a different bridge, further south where the Muswell stream once crossed Green Lanes, at about the point where Lascotts Road joins the High Road (The Muswell Stream is now now diverted via a culvert). This would place it more squarely within the lands of Bowes Manor Farm. The Recorder – Southgate's local paper from the early years of the last century has a few references to"Pymmes Brook Bridge" and the “County Bridge” – but no mention of Deadmans Bridge.

 


 

The earliest recorded reference to Muswe

ll Hill dates back to the mid-twelve century when the Bishop of London, who was the Lord of the Manor of Hornsey, granted some 65 acres to an order of nuns recently established in Clerkenwell. Situated on the east side of Colney Hatch Lane, this land contained a natural spring or well. John Norden, the Tudor Historian described how a King of the Scots was cured of a disease by taking the waters of this well, and in medieval times this well was to become a place of pilgrimage. The nuns built a chapel near it, "bearing the name of our Ladie of Muswell", and Muswell Hill became the name of the district in place of an earlier name. The chapel was to disappear with the dissolution of religious houses by Henry VIII, but administration of the land was to remain with Clerkenwell parish until 1900, and was known as "Clerkenwell Detached".

Albert Close
Muswell Stream To the rear is a tree lined bank which is evidence of the stream

Albert Road
The Muswell Stream flowed north along the western part of the road and was met by a number of tributaries. It flooded the area frequently until drainage was installed in the park.
Recreation Ground.  Some of the remains of the fields of Tottenham Wood Farm and it. It was opened 1893 land of Alexandra Park Company land and lies at the base of two hills. It includes the Pavilion Cafe.
The Muswell Stream flowed across the recreation ground.
Albert Works. In the 1880s this was the Wood Green and Hornsey Steam Laundry but later produced piano parts and like objects. In the Second Wrold War aeroplane parts were made here. In 1952 it was a tile works and later a packing company, 

 
  Crescent Rise
The Muswell Stream flows under the road.
Railway embankment – there is an inspection hatch for the stream on this.

Donovan Avenue
14 & 15 Boundary marker at ground level "1934 BH" indicates the boundary between the Boroughs of Hornsey and Wood Green, both created in 1933. This boundary line is also that of the more ancient parishes of Tottenham and Hornsey back to the Saxons. Note the line in paving stones outside 14.

Durnsford Road
Dip which shows the line of the Muswell Stream

Grove Avenue
Built on the site of three lakes which were inside the park
The Muswell Stream crosses the northern end of the road from Rosebery Avenue where it joins another stream
A stream ran between this road and Roseberry Avenue to join the Muswell Stream. This stream was used for a string of ornamental lakes in the park when the Palace opened for the second time in 1875. The area was sold off for building in 1899
Over bridge on the railway.

Railway Line
Bridge – the line between Alexandra Palace and Bowes Park curves out of the station and the down crosses the main line on a three span plate girder bridge. The up line came down on the eastern side of the station.
A short section of the Muswell Stream remains open between the main line and the Hertford loop tracks.